CGW vs FMO
vs
CGW vs FMO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | FMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | - |
| AUM | $1.0B | $275M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | - |
| Holdings Count | 77 | - |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | - |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | - |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | - |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | - |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | - |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | - |
| Momentum Score | 83 | - |
| Value Score | 52 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
19
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or FMO?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do CGW and FMO hold the same stocks?
CGW and FMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 19 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or FMO?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.