CGW vs FNGG
vs
CGW vs FNGG
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | FNGG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.96% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $115M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 14.48% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 18 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2021-09-29 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | -6.65% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | -3.76% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +1.89% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +71.32% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 45 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 9 |
| Value Score | 52 | 68 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or FNGG?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while FNGG charges 0.96%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and FNGG hold the same stocks?
CGW and FNGG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or FNGG?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while FNGG returned +1.89%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.