CGW vs FQAL
vs
CGW vs FQAL
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.17% |
| Holdings Count | 82 | 129 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +5.03% | +0.04% |
| YTD Return | +3.29% | +7.80% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +17.86% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.93% | +18.53% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.67% | +11.89% |
| 10-Year Return | +9.87% | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 69 |
| Momentum Score | 39 | 56 |
| Value Score | 70 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.2%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
191
Total Unique
Top Shared Holdings
| Ticker | CGW Weight | FQAL Weight |
|---|---|---|
| ECL | 3.85% | 0.22% |
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or FQAL?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and FQAL hold the same stocks?
CGW and FQAL share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. They hold 191 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or FQAL?
Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while FQAL returned +17.86%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.