CGW vs GLOW
vs
CGW vs GLOW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 60 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | GLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.72% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $47M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.43% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 15 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-06-21 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +2.84% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +18.65% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 57 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 64 |
| Value Score | 52 | 45 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
74
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or GLOW?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while GLOW charges 0.72%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and GLOW hold the same stocks?
CGW and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 74 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or GLOW?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while GLOW returned +18.65%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.