CGW vs GTOS
vs
CGW vs GTOS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 280 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | GTOS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.30% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $119M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 4.73% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 508 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2022-12-09 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Short Term High Yield Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +0.09% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.04% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +5.29% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +4.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 52 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 26 |
| Value Score | 52 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
340
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or GTOS?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and GTOS hold the same stocks?
CGW and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 340 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or GTOS?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while GTOS returned +5.29%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.