CGW vs HCOM
vs
CGW vs HCOM
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | HCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 10.95% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 55 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2021-09-14 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Commodities |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | -1.05% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +4.57% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +2.31% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | -5.19% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 55 |
| Value Score | 52 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or HCOM?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while HCOM charges 0.59%. They charge the same expense ratio.
Do CGW and HCOM hold the same stocks?
CGW and HCOM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or HCOM?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while HCOM returned +2.31%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.