CGW vs HFXI
vs
CGW vs HFXI
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs NYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
HFXI has a lower expense ratio. HFXI delivered stronger 1-year returns. HFXI offers more diversification with 843 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | HFXI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.20% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 3.71% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 843 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +5.82% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +5.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +28.39% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +17.20% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | +12.06% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | +10.56% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 71 |
| Value Score | 52 | 64 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or HFXI?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while HFXI charges 0.20%. HFXI is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and HFXI hold the same stocks?
CGW and HFXI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or HFXI?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while HFXI returned +28.39%. HFXI outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.