CGW vs HQH
vs
CGW vs HQH
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs TEKLA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
HQH offers more diversification with 98 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | HQH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | TEKLA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | - |
| AUM | $1.0B | $871M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | - |
| Holdings Count | 77 | - |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | - |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | - |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | - |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | - |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | - |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | - |
| Momentum Score | 83 | - |
| Value Score | 52 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
98
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or HQH?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do CGW and HQH hold the same stocks?
CGW and HQH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 98 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or HQH?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.