CGW vs IGBH
vs
CGW vs IGBH
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 274 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | IGBH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.14% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 6.09% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 274 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Ultrashort Term Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +0.89% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.85% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +7.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +7.78% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | +5.04% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | +4.61% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 41 |
| Value Score | 52 | 63 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or IGBH?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and IGBH hold the same stocks?
CGW and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or IGBH?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while IGBH returned +7.33%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.