CGW vs IZRL
vs
CGW vs IZRL
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 62 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 2.83% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 65 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +2.42% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +1.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +27.23% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +17.68% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | -1.17% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 53 |
| Value Score | 52 | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
122
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or IZRL?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and IZRL hold the same stocks?
CGW and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 122 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or IZRL?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while IZRL returned +27.23%. IZRL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.