CGW vs IZRL
vs
CGW vs IZRL
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 2.83% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 65 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +2.42% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +1.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +27.23% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +17.68% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | -1.17% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 53 |
| Value Score | 52 | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or IZRL?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and IZRL hold the same stocks?
CGW and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or IZRL?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while IZRL returned +27.23%. IZRL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.