CGW vs KF
vs
CGW vs KF
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs The Korea Fund, Inc.
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
KF delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 68 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | KF |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | - |
| AUM | $1.0B | $332M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.57% |
| Holdings Count | 82 | 52 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 1984-08-29 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +5.03% | +2.16% |
| YTD Return | +3.29% | +101.75% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +191.01% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.93% | +51.14% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.67% | +18.79% |
| 10-Year Return | +9.87% | +18.23% |
| Buy Score | 61 | - |
| Momentum Score | 39 | 96 |
| Value Score | 70 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
117
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or KF?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do CGW and KF hold the same stocks?
CGW and KF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 117 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or KF?
Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while KF returned +191.01%. KF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.