CGW vs NAN
vs
CGW vs NAN
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. NAN delivered stronger 1-year returns. NAN offers more diversification with 79 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | NAN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Nuveen |
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 3.77% |
| AUM | $1.0B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 7.50% |
| Holdings Count | 82 | 162 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 1999-05-26 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Municipal New York |
| 1-Month Return | +5.03% | +1.67% |
| YTD Return | +3.29% | +4.39% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +11.20% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.93% | +3.43% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.67% | -0.93% |
| 10-Year Return | +9.87% | +3.35% |
| Buy Score | 61 | 43 |
| Momentum Score | 39 | 44 |
| Value Score | 70 | 20 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
147
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or NAN?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while NAN charges 3.77%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and NAN hold the same stocks?
CGW and NAN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 147 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or NAN?
Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while NAN returned +11.20%. NAN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.