CGW vs NMI

vs

Quick Verdict

CGW has a lower expense ratio. NMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. NMI offers more diversification with 95 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGWNMI
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Nuveen
Expense Ratio0.58%0.73%
AUM$1.0B-
Dividend Yield1.52%4.57%
Holdings Count82220
Inception Date2007-05-141988-04-20
Investment StyleMid Cap BlendMunicipal Bond
1-Month Return+5.03%+1.09%
YTD Return+3.29%+3.37%
1-Year Return+6.67%+7.44%
3-Year Return+9.93%+4.93%
5-Year Return+5.67%+1.16%
10-Year Return+9.87%+4.12%
Buy Score6160
Momentum Score3939
Value Score7034

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
163
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, CGW or NMI?

CGW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while NMI charges 0.73%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do CGW and NMI hold the same stocks?

CGW and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 163 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, CGW or NMI?

Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while NMI returned +7.44%. NMI outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.