CGW vs PATN
vs
CGW vs PATN
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 74 |
| Value Score | 52 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
161
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or PATN?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PATN charges 0.65%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and PATN hold the same stocks?
CGW and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 161 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or PATN?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.