CGW vs PHDG
vs
CGW vs PHDG
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 513 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | PHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 2.06% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 513 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2012-12-05 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +0.30% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +1.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +3.17% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +7.51% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | +4.00% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | +6.36% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 41 |
| Value Score | 52 | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or PHDG?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PHDG charges 0.39%. PHDG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and PHDG hold the same stocks?
CGW and PHDG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or PHDG?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while PHDG returned +3.17%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.