CGW vs SAWS
vs
CGW vs SAWS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 72 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 82 | 72 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +5.03% | +11.92% |
| YTD Return | +3.29% | +22.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +32.24% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.93% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +5.67% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +9.87% | - |
| Buy Score | 61 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 39 | 89 |
| Value Score | 70 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
68
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SAWS?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SAWS hold the same stocks?
CGW and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 68 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SAWS?
Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while SAWS returned +32.24%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.