CGW vs SAWS
vs
CGW vs SAWS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 61 |
| Value Score | 52 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SAWS?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SAWS hold the same stocks?
CGW and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SAWS?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while SAWS returned +8.69%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.