CGW vs SCHQ
vs
CGW vs SCHQ
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 97 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 25 |
| Value Score | 52 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SCHQ?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
CGW and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SCHQ?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.