CGW vs SPGM
vs
CGW vs SPGM
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 82 | 2,985 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +5.03% | -0.57% |
| YTD Return | +3.29% | +11.62% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.67% | +26.38% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.93% | +20.15% |
| 5-Year Return | +5.67% | +11.37% |
| 10-Year Return | +9.87% | +5.53% |
| Buy Score | 61 | 77 |
| Momentum Score | 39 | 69 |
| Value Score | 70 | 66 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
68
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SPGM?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SPGM hold the same stocks?
CGW and SPGM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 68 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SPGM?
Over the past year, CGW returned +6.67% while SPGM returned +26.38%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.