CGW vs SPGM
vs
CGW vs SPGM
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2954 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.80% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 2,954 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2012-02-27 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +3.34% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +2.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +23.81% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +19.04% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | +12.35% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | +5.47% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 76 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 59 |
| Value Score | 52 | 71 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or SPGM?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and SPGM hold the same stocks?
CGW and SPGM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or SPGM?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.