CGW vs TLTP
vs
CGW vs TLTP
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 60 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | TLTP |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Amplify ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $29M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 12.19% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 4 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-10-29 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | -0.27% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +4.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 56 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 23 |
| Value Score | 52 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
63
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or TLTP?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and TLTP hold the same stocks?
CGW and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 63 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or TLTP?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while TLTP returned +4.33%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.