ETW vs FAAR

vs

Quick Verdict

FAAR has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 260 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETWFAAR
Fund FamilyEaton VanceFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio1.10%0.97%
AUM$936M$184M
Dividend Yield7.41%9.75%
Holdings Count2966
Inception Date2005-09-282016-05-18
Investment StyleMulti AlternativeCommodities
1-Month Return+2.57%-1.23%
YTD Return+6.99%+24.73%
1-Year Return+25.51%+41.70%
3-Year Return+16.36%+11.21%
5-Year Return+7.42%+8.29%
10-Year Return+12.68%+5.10%
Buy Score6067
Momentum Score5284
Value Score5453

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
260
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, ETW or FAAR?

ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while FAAR charges 0.97%. FAAR is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do ETW and FAAR hold the same stocks?

ETW and FAAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 260 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, ETW or FAAR?

Over the past year, ETW returned +25.51% while FAAR returned +41.70%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.