ETW vs HUSV

vs

Quick Verdict

HUSV has a lower expense ratio. ETW delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 260 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETWHUSV
Fund FamilyEaton VanceFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio1.10%0.70%
AUM$936M$74M
Dividend Yield7.41%1.33%
Holdings Count296101
Inception Date2005-09-282016-08-24
Investment StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+1.66%+0.67%
YTD Return+8.77%+2.05%
1-Year Return+22.55%-1.06%
3-Year Return+15.50%+7.32%
5-Year Return+7.74%+5.77%
10-Year Return+12.75%-
Buy Score6251
Momentum Score6030
Value Score5157

Holdings Overlap

12.3%
Weight Overlap
28
Shared Holdings
332
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerETW WeightHUSV Weight
AAPL4.29%2.67%
MSFT3.63%2.60%
CSCO0.89%2.84%
KO0.16%2.04%
JNJ0.27%1.54%
COST0.71%0.90%
WM0.07%1.35%
CMS0.45%0.93%
HIG0.17%1.20%
CME0.06%1.17%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, ETW or HUSV?

ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HUSV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do ETW and HUSV hold the same stocks?

ETW and HUSV share 28 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. They hold 332 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, ETW or HUSV?

Over the past year, ETW returned +22.55% while HUSV returned -1.06%. ETW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.