ETW vs MFEM
vs
ETW vs MFEM
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 700 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETW | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $936M | $145M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 2.29% |
| Holdings Count | 296 | 730 |
| Inception Date | 2005-09-28 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +2.57% | +8.22% |
| YTD Return | +6.99% | +27.73% |
| 1-Year Return | +25.51% | +53.63% |
| 3-Year Return | +16.36% | +24.35% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.42% | +9.16% |
| 10-Year Return | +12.68% | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 87 |
| Momentum Score | 52 | 88 |
| Value Score | 54 | 51 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
960
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ETW or MFEM?
ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ETW and MFEM hold the same stocks?
ETW and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 960 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ETW or MFEM?
Over the past year, ETW returned +25.51% while MFEM returned +53.63%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.