ETW vs TYLG
vs
ETW vs TYLG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 260 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETW | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $936M | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 7.86% |
| Holdings Count | 296 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2005-09-28 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Multi Alternative | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +2.57% | +11.78% |
| YTD Return | +6.99% | +21.78% |
| 1-Year Return | +25.51% | +48.67% |
| 3-Year Return | +16.36% | +24.73% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.42% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +12.68% | - |
| Buy Score | 60 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 52 | 81 |
| Value Score | 54 | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ETW or TYLG?
ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ETW and TYLG hold the same stocks?
ETW and TYLG share 18 common holdings with a 20.4% weight overlap. They hold 316 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ETW or TYLG?
Over the past year, ETW returned +25.51% while TYLG returned +48.67%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.