FAAR vs FQAL
vs
FAAR vs FQAL
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $165M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 1.10% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 130 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | +1.52% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +15.18% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +19.11% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | +14.01% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | 74 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 49 |
| Value Score | 55 | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or FQAL?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and FQAL hold the same stocks?
FAAR and FQAL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or FQAL?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while FQAL returned +15.18%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.