FAAR vs FQAL
vs
FAAR vs FQAL
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $165M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 1.10% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 130 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | +1.52% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +15.18% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +19.11% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | +14.01% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | 74 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 49 |
| Value Score | 55 | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
128
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or FQAL?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and FQAL hold the same stocks?
FAAR and FQAL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 128 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or FQAL?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while FQAL returned +15.18%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.