FAAR vs FTGS

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARFTGS
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.60%
AUM$187M$1.3B
Dividend Yield9.75%0.08%
Holdings Count651
Inception Date2016-05-182022-10-25
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Growth
1-Month Return-6.77%-1.12%
YTD Return+16.29%+4.73%
1-Year Return+25.83%+8.32%
3-Year Return+9.62%+16.75%
5-Year Return+6.99%-
10-Year Return+4.39%-
Buy Score7567
Momentum Score7744
Value Score5072

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
51
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or FTGS?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while FTGS charges 0.60%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and FTGS hold the same stocks?

FAAR and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 51 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or FTGS?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +25.83% while FTGS returned +8.32%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.