FAAR vs FTGS

vs

Quick Verdict

FTGS has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 51 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARFTGS
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.60%
AUM$165M$1.2B
Dividend Yield10.44%0.16%
Holdings Count3051
Inception Date2016-05-182022-10-25
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Growth
1-Month Return+3.07%+1.50%
YTD Return+11.28%+1.44%
1-Year Return+19.40%+10.72%
3-Year Return+6.43%+18.08%
5-Year Return+7.18%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6571
Momentum Score8647
Value Score5566

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or FTGS?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while FTGS charges 0.60%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and FTGS hold the same stocks?

FAAR and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or FTGS?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while FTGS returned +10.72%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.