FAAR vs GLOW

vs

Quick Verdict

GLOW has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FAAR offers more diversification with 30 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARGLOW
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Victory Capital Management Inc.
Expense Ratio0.97%0.72%
AUM$165M$47M
Dividend Yield10.44%1.43%
Holdings Count3015
Inception Date2016-05-182024-06-21
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+3.07%+2.84%
YTD Return+11.28%+3.51%
1-Year Return+19.40%+18.65%
3-Year Return+6.43%-
5-Year Return+7.18%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6557
Momentum Score8664
Value Score5545

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or GLOW?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while GLOW charges 0.72%. GLOW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and GLOW hold the same stocks?

FAAR and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or GLOW?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while GLOW returned +18.65%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.