FAAR vs IG
vs
FAAR vs IG
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 248 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Principal Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.19% |
| AUM | $187M | $200M |
| Dividend Yield | 9.75% | 5.07% |
| Holdings Count | 6 | 248 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2018-04-18 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Long Term Mid Quality |
| 1-Month Return | -6.77% | +0.20% |
| YTD Return | +16.29% | +1.20% |
| 1-Year Return | +25.83% | +4.67% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.62% | +5.34% |
| 5-Year Return | +6.99% | -0.02% |
| 10-Year Return | +4.39% | - |
| Buy Score | 75 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 77 | 30 |
| Value Score | 50 | 52 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or IG?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IG charges 0.19%. IG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and IG hold the same stocks?
FAAR and IG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or IG?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +25.83% while IG returned +4.67%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.