FAAR vs MFEM

vs

Quick Verdict

MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARMFEM
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)PIMCO (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.49%
AUM$165M$127M
Dividend Yield10.44%2.32%
Holdings Count30772
Inception Date2016-05-182017-08-31
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Value
1-Month Return+3.07%+9.42%
YTD Return+11.28%+7.98%
1-Year Return+19.40%+37.08%
3-Year Return+6.43%+15.74%
5-Year Return+7.18%+7.46%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score6568
Momentum Score8679
Value Score5553

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or MFEM?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and MFEM hold the same stocks?

FAAR and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or MFEM?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.