FAAR vs MFEM

vs

Quick Verdict

MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 699 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARMFEM
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)PIMCO (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.49%
AUM$187M$145M
Dividend Yield9.75%2.14%
Holdings Count6730
Inception Date2016-05-182017-08-31
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Value
1-Month Return-6.77%-5.75%
YTD Return+16.29%+20.38%
1-Year Return+25.83%+36.47%
3-Year Return+9.62%+20.04%
5-Year Return+6.99%+7.58%
10-Year Return+4.39%-
Buy Score7581
Momentum Score7784
Value Score5052

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
700
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or MFEM?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and MFEM hold the same stocks?

FAAR and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 700 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or MFEM?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +25.83% while MFEM returned +36.47%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.