FAAR vs SAWS
vs
FAAR vs SAWS
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $165M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 61 |
| Value Score | 55 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or SAWS?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FAAR and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or SAWS?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while SAWS returned +8.69%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.