FAAR vs SAWS
vs
FAAR vs SAWS
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $187M | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 9.75% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 6 | 72 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -6.77% | +11.92% |
| YTD Return | +16.29% | +22.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +25.83% | +32.24% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.62% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +6.99% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +4.39% | - |
| Buy Score | 75 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 77 | 89 |
| Value Score | 56 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
72
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or SAWS?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FAAR and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 72 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or SAWS?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +25.83% while SAWS returned +32.24%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.