FAAR vs SCHQ
vs
FAAR vs SCHQ
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 10 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $165M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 25 |
| Value Score | 55 | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
14
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or SCHQ?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
FAAR and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 14 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or SCHQ?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.