FAAR vs SPGM

vs

Quick Verdict

SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2954 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFAARSPGM
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
Expense Ratio0.97%0.09%
AUM$165M$1.5B
Dividend Yield10.44%1.80%
Holdings Count302,954
Inception Date2016-05-182012-02-27
Investment StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return+3.07%+3.34%
YTD Return+11.28%+2.71%
1-Year Return+19.40%+23.81%
3-Year Return+6.43%+19.04%
5-Year Return+7.18%+12.35%
10-Year Return-+5.47%
Buy Score6576
Momentum Score8659
Value Score5571

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FAAR or SPGM?

FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FAAR and SPGM hold the same stocks?

FAAR and SPGM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FAAR or SPGM?

Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while SPGM returned +23.81%. SPGM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.