FAAR vs TYLG
vs
FAAR vs TYLG
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $165M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | - |
| Momentum Score | 86 | - |
| Value Score | 55 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
75
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or TYLG?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FAAR and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 75 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or TYLG?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while TYLG returned +15.55%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.