FAAR vs TYLG
vs
FAAR vs TYLG
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. FAAR delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 74 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $165M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.44% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 30 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2016-05-18 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Commodities | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +3.07% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +19.40% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +6.43% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.18% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 65 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 86 | 29 |
| Value Score | 55 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FAAR or TYLG?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FAAR and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FAAR and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FAAR or TYLG?
Over the past year, FAAR returned +19.40% while TYLG returned +15.55%. FAAR outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.