FLGV vs GTOS

vs

Quick Verdict

FLGV has a lower expense ratio. FLGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLGVGTOS
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Invesco (US)
Expense Ratio0.09%0.30%
AUM$1.0B$119M
Dividend Yield3.99%4.73%
Holdings Count48508
Inception Date2020-06-092022-12-09
Investment StyleIntermediate Term US Government BondShort Term High Yield Bond
1-Month Return+0.10%+0.09%
YTD Return+0.15%+0.04%
1-Year Return+5.85%+5.29%
3-Year Return+2.58%+4.99%
5-Year Return-0.76%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7152
Momentum Score2826
Value Score67-

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FLGV or GTOS?

FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while GTOS charges 0.30%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FLGV and GTOS hold the same stocks?

FLGV and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FLGV or GTOS?

Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while GTOS returned +5.29%. FLGV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.