FLGV vs MFEM
vs
FLGV vs MFEM
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 48 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2020-06-09 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Intermediate Term US Government Bond | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.10% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +0.15% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.85% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +2.58% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.76% | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 28 | 79 |
| Value Score | 67 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
736
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FLGV or MFEM?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while MFEM charges 0.49%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FLGV and MFEM hold the same stocks?
FLGV and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 736 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FLGV or MFEM?
Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.