FLGV vs NMI

vs

Quick Verdict

FLGV has a lower expense ratio. NMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. NMI offers more diversification with 95 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLGVNMI
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Nuveen
Expense Ratio0.09%0.73%
AUM$1.0B-
Dividend Yield4.13%4.57%
Holdings Count47220
Inception Date2020-06-091988-04-20
Investment StyleIntermediate Term US Government BondMunicipal Bond
1-Month Return+0.25%+1.09%
YTD Return+0.53%+3.37%
1-Year Return+2.80%+7.44%
3-Year Return+3.19%+4.93%
5-Year Return-0.18%+1.16%
10-Year Return-+4.12%
Buy Score7160
Momentum Score2239
Value Score6134

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
95
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FLGV or NMI?

FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while NMI charges 0.73%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FLGV and NMI hold the same stocks?

FLGV and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 95 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FLGV or NMI?

Over the past year, FLGV returned +2.80% while NMI returned +7.44%. NMI outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.