FLGV vs PATN
vs
FLGV vs PATN
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 48 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2020-06-09 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Intermediate Term US Government Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.10% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +0.15% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.85% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | +2.58% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -0.76% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 28 | 74 |
| Value Score | 67 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FLGV or PATN?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while PATN charges 0.65%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FLGV and PATN hold the same stocks?
FLGV and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FLGV or PATN?
Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.