FLGV vs SAWS

vs

Quick Verdict

FLGV has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 70 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLGVSAWS
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
Expense Ratio0.09%0.55%
AUM$1.0B$6M
Dividend Yield3.99%0.02%
Holdings Count4871
Inception Date2020-06-092024-07-30
Investment StyleIntermediate Term US Government BondSmall Cap Growth
1-Month Return+0.10%+4.06%
YTD Return+0.15%+3.70%
1-Year Return+5.85%+8.69%
3-Year Return+2.58%-
5-Year Return-0.76%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7166
Momentum Score2861
Value Score6749

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
113
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FLGV or SAWS?

FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SAWS charges 0.55%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FLGV and SAWS hold the same stocks?

FLGV and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 113 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FLGV or SAWS?

Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while SAWS returned +8.69%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.