FLGV vs SCHQ
vs
FLGV vs SCHQ
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. SCHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 98 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $756M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 4.73% |
| Holdings Count | 47 | 98 |
| Inception Date | 2020-06-09 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Intermediate Term US Government Bond | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.25% | +1.03% |
| YTD Return | +0.53% | +0.99% |
| 1-Year Return | +2.80% | +2.87% |
| 3-Year Return | +3.19% | -0.50% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.18% | -5.65% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 22 | 25 |
| Value Score | 61 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
41
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FLGV or SCHQ?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FLGV and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
FLGV and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 41 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FLGV or SCHQ?
Over the past year, FLGV returned +2.80% while SCHQ returned +2.87%. SCHQ outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.