FLGV vs TYLG
vs
FLGV vs TYLG
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 74 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 7.86% |
| Holdings Count | 47 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2020-06-09 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Intermediate Term US Government Bond | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.25% | +0.28% |
| YTD Return | +0.53% | +22.13% |
| 1-Year Return | +2.80% | +38.91% |
| 3-Year Return | +3.19% | +23.14% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.18% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 22 | 86 |
| Value Score | 61 | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
115
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FLGV or TYLG?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FLGV and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FLGV and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 115 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FLGV or TYLG?
Over the past year, FLGV returned +2.80% while TYLG returned +38.91%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.