FLGV vs TYLG
vs
FLGV vs TYLG
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 74 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 48 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2020-06-09 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Intermediate Term US Government Bond | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +0.10% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +0.15% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +5.85% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +2.58% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -0.76% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 71 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 28 | 29 |
| Value Score | 67 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FLGV or TYLG?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FLGV and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FLGV and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FLGV or TYLG?
Over the past year, FLGV returned +5.85% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.