FMO vs FQAL
vs
FMO vs FQAL
Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMO | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.15% |
| AUM | $275M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.10% |
| Holdings Count | - | 130 |
| Inception Date | - | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | - | +1.52% |
| YTD Return | - | +1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | - | +15.18% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +19.11% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +14.01% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | - | 74 |
| Momentum Score | - | 49 |
| Value Score | - | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
19
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FMO or FQAL?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do FMO and FQAL hold the same stocks?
FMO and FQAL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 19 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FMO or FQAL?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.