FMO vs SCHQ
vs
FMO vs SCHQ
Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ offers more diversification with 97 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMO | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% |
| AUM | $275M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | - | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | - | 97 |
| Inception Date | - | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | - | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | - | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | - | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | - | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | - | 61 |
| Momentum Score | - | 25 |
| Value Score | - | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
19
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FMO or SCHQ?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do FMO and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
FMO and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 19 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FMO or SCHQ?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.