FNGG vs FQAL

vs

Quick Verdict

FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNGGFQAL
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustFidelity Investments (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.15%
AUM$126M$1.4B
Dividend Yield11.05%1.17%
Holdings Count18129
Inception Date2021-09-292016-09-12
Investment StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return-16.73%+0.04%
YTD Return+11.29%+7.80%
1-Year Return+14.76%+17.86%
3-Year Return+48.10%+18.53%
5-Year Return-+11.89%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score4569
Momentum Score6656
Value Score-73

Holdings Overlap

27.3%
Weight Overlap
8
Shared Holdings
128
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerFNGG WeightFQAL Weight
NVDA4.96%7.47%
AAPL5.35%6.18%
GOOGL4.82%5.78%
MSFT4.97%4.72%
AVGO5.03%3.59%
META4.72%2.08%
NFLX5.32%0.78%
PLTR4.88%1.02%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FNGG or FQAL?

FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FNGG and FQAL hold the same stocks?

FNGG and FQAL share 8 common holdings with a 27.3% weight overlap. They hold 128 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FNGG or FQAL?

Over the past year, FNGG returned +14.76% while FQAL returned +17.86%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.