FNGG vs HUSV

vs

Quick Verdict

HUSV has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 100 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNGGHUSV
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.97%0.70%
AUM$126M$74M
Dividend Yield11.05%1.33%
Holdings Count18101
Inception Date2021-09-292016-08-24
Investment StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return-16.73%+0.67%
YTD Return+11.29%+2.05%
1-Year Return+14.76%-1.06%
3-Year Return+48.10%+7.32%
5-Year Return-+5.77%
10-Year Return--
Buy Score4551
Momentum Score6630
Value Score-57

Holdings Overlap

5.3%
Weight Overlap
2
Shared Holdings
110
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerFNGG WeightHUSV Weight
AAPL5.35%2.67%
MSFT4.97%2.60%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FNGG or HUSV?

FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HUSV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FNGG and HUSV hold the same stocks?

FNGG and HUSV share 2 common holdings with a 5.3% weight overlap. They hold 110 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FNGG or HUSV?

Over the past year, FNGG returned +14.76% while HUSV returned -1.06%. FNGG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.