FNGG vs MFEM
vs
FNGG vs MFEM
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. MFEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $115M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 14.48% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 18 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-29 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | -6.65% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | -3.76% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +1.89% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +71.32% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 45 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 9 | 79 |
| Value Score | 68 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
706
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FNGG or MFEM?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FNGG and MFEM hold the same stocks?
FNGG and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 706 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FNGG or MFEM?
Over the past year, FNGG returned +1.89% while MFEM returned +37.08%. MFEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.