FNGG vs PATN

vs

Quick Verdict

PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNGGPATN
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustPacer ETFs
Expense Ratio0.97%0.65%
AUM$126M$191M
Dividend Yield11.05%1.59%
Holdings Count18106
Inception Date2021-09-292024-09-16
Investment StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return-16.73%-0.48%
YTD Return+11.29%+34.18%
1-Year Return+14.76%+61.44%
3-Year Return+48.10%-
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score4579
Momentum Score6692
Value Score--

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
12
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, FNGG or PATN?

FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do FNGG and PATN hold the same stocks?

FNGG and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 12 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, FNGG or PATN?

Over the past year, FNGG returned +14.76% while PATN returned +61.44%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.