FNGG vs SAWS
vs
FNGG vs SAWS
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $126M | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.05% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 18 | 72 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-29 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -16.73% | +11.92% |
| YTD Return | +11.29% | +22.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +14.76% | +32.24% |
| 3-Year Return | +48.10% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 45 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 66 | 89 |
| Value Score | - | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
83
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FNGG or SAWS?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FNGG and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FNGG and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 83 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FNGG or SAWS?
Over the past year, FNGG returned +14.76% while SAWS returned +32.24%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.