FNGG vs SAWS
vs
FNGG vs SAWS
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $115M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 14.48% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 18 | 71 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-29 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -6.65% | +4.06% |
| YTD Return | -3.76% | +3.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +1.89% | +8.69% |
| 3-Year Return | +71.32% | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 45 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 9 | 61 |
| Value Score | 68 | 49 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FNGG or SAWS?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FNGG and SAWS hold the same stocks?
FNGG and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FNGG or SAWS?
Over the past year, FNGG returned +1.89% while SAWS returned +8.69%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.