FNGG vs TYLG
vs
FNGG vs TYLG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 74 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $115M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 14.48% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 18 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2021-09-29 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | -6.65% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | -3.76% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +1.89% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +71.32% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 45 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 9 | 29 |
| Value Score | 68 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FNGG or TYLG?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FNGG and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FNGG and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FNGG or TYLG?
Over the past year, FNGG returned +1.89% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.