FQAL vs GLOW
vs
FQAL vs GLOW
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | GLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.72% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $47M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.43% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 15 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2024-06-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +2.84% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +18.65% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 57 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 64 |
| Value Score | 74 | 45 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or GLOW?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and GLOW hold the same stocks?
FQAL and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or GLOW?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while GLOW returned +18.65%. GLOW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.