FQAL vs GLOW
vs
FQAL vs GLOW
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | GLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.72% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $47M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.43% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 15 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2024-06-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +2.84% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +18.65% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 57 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 64 |
| Value Score | 74 | 45 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
138
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or GLOW?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and GLOW hold the same stocks?
FQAL and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 138 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or GLOW?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while GLOW returned +18.65%. GLOW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.