FQAL vs GTOS
vs
FQAL vs GTOS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 280 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | GTOS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $119M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.73% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 508 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2022-12-09 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Short Term High Yield Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | +0.09% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +0.04% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +5.29% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +4.99% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 52 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 26 |
| Value Score | 74 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
404
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or GTOS?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while GTOS charges 0.30%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and GTOS hold the same stocks?
FQAL and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 404 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or GTOS?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while GTOS returned +5.29%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.