FQAL vs HCOM
vs
FQAL vs HCOM
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. FQAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | HCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 10.95% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 55 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2021-09-14 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Commodities |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | -1.05% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +4.57% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +2.31% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | -5.19% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 55 |
| Value Score | 74 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
124
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or HCOM?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while HCOM charges 0.59%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and HCOM hold the same stocks?
FQAL and HCOM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 124 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or HCOM?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while HCOM returned +2.31%. FQAL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.